I recently attended a talk at Manifest by Chad Jones on the economic effects of AI. Much of it was sensible. Unlike many economists, he gives careful consideration to AI becoming pretty powerful soon. But his main scenarios predict much slower growth than I expect.
His paper Past Automation and Future A.I.: How Weak Links Tame the Growth Explosion clarifies the parts of his talk that puzzled me. This post explores where our assumptions differ.
The fastest scenario that he considers (figure 6 – The Future if AI = ‘Moore’s Law Everywhere’) has economic growth rising to 13% by 2040. Whereas I expect at least 30% growth by then, due to automation happening earlier than he’s willing to imagine.
The key areas where I disagree with him are beliefs about the extent to which growth will be constrained by weak links, which likely stems from differing beliefs about how general-purpose AI will be.
Continue Reading