{"id":696,"date":"2010-08-31T18:33:37","date_gmt":"2010-09-01T02:33:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bayesianinvestor.com\/blog\/?p=696"},"modified":"2015-10-12T18:59:00","modified_gmt":"2015-10-13T02:59:00","slug":"drive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bayesianinvestor.com\/blog\/index.php\/2010\/08\/31\/drive\/","title":{"rendered":"Drive"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Book review: Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us, by Daniel H. Pink.<\/p>\n<p>This book explores some of the complexities of what motivates humans. It attacks a stereotype that says only financial rewards matter, and exaggerates the extent to which people adopt that fallacy. His style is similar to Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s, but with more substance than Gladwell.<\/p>\n<p>The book&#8217;s advice is likely to cause some improvement in how businesses are run and in how people choose careers. But I wonder how many bosses will ignore it because their desire to exert control over people outweighs their desire to create successful companies.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not satisfied with the way he and others classify motivations as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Motivation#Intrinsic_and_extrinsic_motivation\">intrinsic and extrinsic<\/a>. While feelings of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Flow_%28psychology%29\">flow<\/a> may be almost entirely internally generated, other motivations that he classifies as intrinsic seem to involve an important component of feeling that others are rewarding you with higher status\/reputation.<\/p>\n<p>Shirking may have been a been an important problem a century ago for which financial rewards were appropriate solutions, but the nature of work has changed so that it&#8217;s much less common for workers to want to put less effort into a job. The author implies that this means standard financial rewards have become fairly unimportant factors in determining productivity. I think he underestimates the importance they play in determining how goals are prioritized.<\/p>\n<p>He believes the changes in work that reduced the importance of financial incentives was the replacement of rule-following routine work with work that requires creativity. I suggest that another factor was that in 1900, work often required muscle-power that consumed almost as much energy as a worker could afford to feed himself.<\/p>\n<p>He states his claims vaguely enough that they could be interpreted as implying that broad categories of financial incentives (including stock options and equity) work poorly. I checked one of the references that sounded like it might address that (&#8220;When performance-related pay backfires&#8221;), and found it only dealt with payments for completing specific tasks.<\/p>\n<p>His complaints about excessive focus on quarterly earnings probably have some value, but it&#8217;s important to remember that it&#8217;s easy to err in the other direction as well (the dot-com bubble seemed to coincide with an unusual amount of effort at focusing on earnings 5 to 10 years away).<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m disappointed that he advises not to encourage workers to compete against each other without offering evidence about its effects.<\/p>\n<p>One interesting story is the bonus system at Kimley-Horn and Associates, where any employee can award another employee $50 for doing something exceptional. I&#8217;d be interested in more tests of this &#8211; is there something special about Kimley-Horn that prevents abuse, or would it work in most companies?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Book review: Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us, by Daniel H. Pink. This book explores some of the complexities of what motivates humans. It attacks a stereotype that says only financial rewards matter, and exaggerates the extent to which people adopt that fallacy. His style is similar to Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s, but with more [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[16,27],"tags":[87,63,81,132],"class_list":["post-696","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-econ","category-mind","tag-incentives","tag-psychology","tag-status","tag-willpower"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/s80O1l-drive","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bayesianinvestor.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/696","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bayesianinvestor.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bayesianinvestor.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bayesianinvestor.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bayesianinvestor.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=696"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/bayesianinvestor.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/696\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":717,"href":"https:\/\/bayesianinvestor.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/696\/revisions\/717"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bayesianinvestor.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=696"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bayesianinvestor.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=696"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bayesianinvestor.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=696"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}